INVESTIGATION

Election Judges

Election Judge Problems 

Plagued the 2016 Baltimore City Primary

When the election results were decertified it highlighted multiple areas of failure. 

Question #1

 

Did Election Judges working in the 2016 Baltimore City Primary

perform their jobs correctly?


 

Answer

IF THE JUDGES DID THEIR JOBS CORRECTLY THERE WOULD BE 

NO DISCREPANCIES

IN THE VOTE COUNTS

but 286  of  296 PRECINCTS HAD DISCREPANCIES!

# of voters checked in SHOULD # of Voter Authority Cards issued SHOULD = # of ballots cast

                                            

BUT THOSE COUNTS WEREN'T EQUAL IN MOST PRECINCTS

Read our Public Information Act request
for documents which will show details of
Election Judge actions.
Read  Baltimore City Board of Elections Director Armstead Jones’ letter with PIA
fees intended to dissuade our investigation.
Read M20-20W response 
to State Elections Administrator
Linda Lamone.

Question #2

Where Election Judges 

assigned to precincts

in accordance with Maryland Law?

Answer

Election Judges were NOT assigned according to the requirements of law.

 

Click the buttons below for details.

We have provided testimony to local and State lawmakers and Legislative Committees but so far NOBODY has been held accountable by those with authority at either level of government........and

  • No other analysis has been done since to correct the problems despite our published evidence, verbal & written testimony.

  • And nothing prevents these problems from impacting future elections.

MARYLAND 20-20 WATCH has always and continues to encourage the public's volunteer  (paid) participation as an "official" election judge. In fact, after you have been selected to be an Election Judge, please reach out to us and we will provide to you FREE an education on the "duties & powers" you have BEYOND what they tell you!
               BE THE CHANGE YOU SEEK.

 This offer provided by MD20-20 WATCH - December 20, 2016

Started 3-21