Maryland 20-20 Watch
INVESTIGATION
Election Judges
Election Judge Problems
Plagued the 2016 Baltimore City Primary
When the election results were decertified it highlighted multiple areas of failure.
Question #1
Did Election Judges working in the 2016 Baltimore City Primary
perform their jobs correctly?
Answer
IF THE JUDGES DID THEIR JOBS CORRECTLY THERE WOULD BE
NO DISCREPANCIES
IN THE VOTE COUNTS
but 286 of 296 PRECINCTS HAD DISCREPANCIES!
# of voters checked in SHOULD = # of Voter Authority Cards issued SHOULD = # of ballots cast
BUT THOSE COUNTS WEREN'T EQUAL IN MOST PRECINCTS
Read our Public Information Act request
for documents which will show details of
Election Judge actions.
Read Baltimore City Board of Elections Director Armstead Jones’ letter with PIA
fees intended to dissuade our investigation.
Question #2
Where Election Judges
assigned to precincts
in accordance with Maryland Law?
Answer
Election Judges were NOT assigned according to the requirements of law.
Click the buttons below for details.
We have provided testimony to local and State lawmakers and Legislative Committees but so far NOBODY has been held accountable by those with authority at either level of government........and
-
No other analysis has been done since to correct the problems despite our published evidence, verbal & written testimony.
-
And nothing prevents these problems from impacting future elections.
MARYLAND 20-20 WATCH has always and continues to encourage the public's volunteer (paid) participation as an "official" election judge. In fact, after you have been selected to be an Election Judge, please reach out to us and we will provide to you FREE an education on the "duties & powers" you have BEYOND what they tell you!
BE THE CHANGE YOU SEEK.
This offer provided by MD20-20 WATCH - December 20, 2016
Started 3-21