RDStudyProject
ANNOUNCEMENT - On the record.
I have been engaged in a comprehensive review related to the two majority Parties in Maryland. It is a comparative study between the MDGOP & MDDEM and each of their Central Committees - the structure/Bylaws/representation/participation/attendence....meeting schedules & events, with a nod to social media interactions/presence, fundraising, grassroots organization and the use (fail/success rate) of focused subject specific goal-oriented subcommittees.
One preliminary observation is official websites - State and Local - are (in a word) CRAP‼️ Outdated, not very user friendly, blank or inaccurate information....very unprofessional.
BUT THERE'S MORE.
👉🏾My working title: "RDStudyProject"
♦️I thought when I started it that it'd be a general review but it's become very complicated....and eye-opening as I peel back the layers.
♦️My first blush opinion was: ALL this should be much more transparent, easily accessible to the voting public & more inclusive. (Both parties, while pretending to be "open", are guilty of making the business of politics secretive).
♦️There's many similarities with organizational written instructions (almost verbatim but not in the execution with compliance to Bylaws/operating rules/laws). GOP being the least compliant.
✳️ (That wasn't a shock to me) 😉
The differences I have noticed DO present a case that appears to have a direct correlation to the successful outcome of elections....and representation in the political arena.
👉🏾 To my knowledge, there's NEVER been such a study or research undertaken. I'll be publishing my results along with recommendations in the near future.
STAY TUNED md20-20watch.com/blog
#NewtonSaidIt July 27, 2024 at 6:00PM
William Newton
Chief Research Investigator with
Maryland 20-20 Watch
Over a decade of nonpartisan freely accessed publications, reports, audits and educational information.
Commentaires