THE SAVE ACT - Review
- crowsden
- Feb 14
- 3 min read
Y'all might note that Maryland already requires identification when you REGISTER TO VOTE.
AND The SAVE ACT, if passed, will require you to provide certain additional identification "when you REGISTER TO VOTE"......
šØ BUT ONLY FOR FUTURE REGISTRATIONSā¼ļø
*ļøā£ Nearly every "amended" line uses the phrasing: "documentary proof of United States citizenship". So clearly the only "target" throughout this act is aimed at non-citizens voting in FEDERAL ELECTIONS, but NOTHING that prevents non-citizens from voting in State and local municipality elections. š² LET THAT SINK IN....
*ļøā£ And nothing about stopping double scanned ballots, harvesting, drop boxes, counting/handling, compliance with any other election law that's already being ignored.
šš½What about Dark Moneyā
.....I get sick of hearing "it's only Democrats who cheat".
šš½What about those "Mail-In Ballotsā
.....I could and have identified so many holes in the process that invites fraud.
THIS ADMINISTRATION AND THIS CONGRESS HAS DONE NOTHING TO SECURE OUR ELECTIONSā¼ļø
.....Under the SAVE ACT, you will be required to "simply" identify yourself with some basic form of identification when attempting to cast your ballot....which is then cross-checked in the poll books at your voting location at the time you arrive to cast a ballot.....by an INTERNAL ELECTION OFFICIAL.....
ā¦ļø HOPEFULLY YOU'LL ABLE TO FATHOM WHAT IS BEING SHOVED INTO YOUR EMPTY HEAD AND EXECUTE YOUR OWN DUE DILIGENCE & NOT RELY ON GRIFTING SOCIAL MEDIA IDIOTS THAT "SHARE" INSTEAD OF EDUCATE.
MORE "TRICKY WORDS" FOR EXAMPLE: Secretary Noem discussed what she framed as the implementation of "new security protocols" (SHE WENT ON TO OUTLINE WHAT WAS IN THE SAVE ACT) -
šØ"......DESIGNED TO BOLSTER PUBLIC CONFIDENCE", she said in the news conference.....
.....and "to provide a unified defense against potential threats to the electoral cycle".
She further added: "This event serves as a formal record of
šØ the administration's commitment to SUPPORTING STATE-LED and LOCALLY EXECUTED security measures across the country."
š LISTEN IN.....
šØ HERE'S A DIFFERENT VIEW - Arizona local network news....the same speech but with some counter opinions, peppered with a few factsā¼ļø
POINTS -
āŖļøTHIS ONLY RELATES TO FEDERAL ELECTIONS - NOT LOCAL STATE OR MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS.
āŖļø You're required to provide accepted ID when REGISTERING AS A NEW VOTER....which is already required with your application.
āŖļø A NEW procedure - When "checking-in" to vote at the polls, you'll be asked to provide personal ID.....that you ALREADY have on you. (Specifically stated).
āŖļø These "new" protocols for identifying yourself ARE NOT NEW.... perhaps the added layer of providing an accepted physical ID, whereas in the past it was merely a Q&A activity of confirmation but this added step won't have much affect overall..... I mean you're standing there ready to vote, authorized with some confirming ID in your pocket, then showing it to whoever is sitting at the table.
āŖļø This "Save Act" as described STILL leaves the "security measures" in the hands of the STATE-LED administration and executed by LOCAL authorities/volunteers to adopt/execute/conduct.... What could go wrong that doesn't alreadyāļøš
but with the SAVE ACT, the Trump Administration wants you to know IT IS "COMMITTED" to "supporting" that..... š
āŖļø Moreover, what defines this a nothing but theatre, is the statement that all of this is "DESIGNED TO BOLSTER PUBLIC CONFIDENCE".
Each of the words in that statement are the Operative words.
šš½ READ THE WORDS AGAIN
"DESIGNED TO BOLSTER PUBLIC CONFIDENCE".
So is it really about anything other than simply MAKING YOU BELIEVE our election results and the process is trustworthy?
ā¦ļø BECAUSE NOTHING in any of this addresses "CORRUPT INTERNAL ELECTION PERSONNEL"Ā©ā¼ļø NOTHINGā¼ļø
In fact, Trump & Noem acknowledge that the Trump Administration lacks the authority to do ANYTHING about it, by law......
that also means an Executive Order is un-Constitutional.
I HAVE REPEATEDLY identified the Constitutional guidance in Article I, Section 4, Clause 1.
READ IT......
ā FOR the record, take a look at the "REQUIRED" parts of the current Maryland application to register to vote. (Attached).
ā ALSO READ THE ACTUAL "SAVE ACT" - Text - H.R.22 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): SAVE Act | Congress.gov | Library of Congress https://share.google/8uBIkeegayGusm2cu
š AND REMEMBER - I have tried to educate you and NOTHING currently in the pipeline will MAKE ELECTIONS GREAT AGAINā¼ļø
The Truth is....they NEVER have been. They NEVER will be....until those who hold "elected" public office and have profited from this corrupt system are held accountable for the fraud it has permitted.
AND I AM THE ONLY PERSON THAT HAS BEEN CONSISTENT WITH THE MESSAGE - the real problem is NOT voter rolls, machines, non-citizens voting, foreign interference or space aliensā¼ļø
It's "CORRUPT INTERNAL ELECTION PERSONNEL"Ā©ā¼ļø PERIOD. #NewtonSaidIt
.....I only wish y'all would just
"GET A CLUE"Ā©
{logged February 14, 2026 at 4:30 pm by William Newton}
Comments