HUGE ELECTION INTEGRITY VICTORY -NOT

♦️Nothing "HUGE" here except the size of the spin......and perhaps some people's gullibility ‼️🤔

MARCH 8, 2025 from William Newton

THERE'S a lot of false claims and misrepresentation about this so called "huge victory" by members of the Maryland Republican Party, Limelighting "Election Integrity" Grifters (and their "retweeters") about the recent deep state RITE lawsuit......

♦️These false claims and misinterpretations are the result of most people's ignorance because of what they're being told by individuals and Party members exaggerating the facts and stretching the Truth.....I can only guess, to inflate their own egos ⁉️

👉🏾Part of the false claim states that "the Court found" that the State Board of Elections (SBE) was NOT in compliance with the NVRA.

THAT'S COMPLETELY FALSE‼️

👉🏾Perhaps the Plaintiffs are not satisfied that the SBE wasn't moving fast enough for them but there's nothing in the NVRA that discusses "speed".....it only directs that a process required by law (the NVRA ACT) is in place and active.

👉🏾I can assure you there IS a process in place and it's active.

👉🏾Simply stated: The main directive regarding COMPLIANCE with the NVRA requires the government election entity to have in place a published procedure and that it's active.

The Maryland State Board of Elections DOES have an active voter roll/registration maintenance program in place - So that means on THIS issue, they are in compliance rendering the claim by these Plaintiffs that: 'they are NOT' - FALSE‼️

https://elections.maryland.gov/voter_registration/list_maintenance.html

♦️Anyone that can read and comprehend English will quickly discover that there are also in place, via the NVRA, instructions that PREVENT a registered voter from being improperly REMOVED from the voter roll by anyone within the agency. You've heard me call them "CORRUPT INTERNAL ELECTION PERSONNEL"© many times.

✳️ (Something that IF permitted without the legal safeguards would be very detrimental to the outcome of election results; the accuracy and trust....and something that should NOT be left in the hands of any individual in the department to independently decide). A point the Plaintiffs fail to recognize.

♦️NVRA has three primary purposes (in law).

✅ 1) to protect removal of any voter from the roll without a written process in place to ensure that nobody is removed without due process (proof/vetting).....

✅ 2) to have in place coordinated efforts across various government agencies to confirm the accuracy of a voter's information....

✅ 3) to remove any registered voter from the rolls ONLY AFTER a determination that that registration was in error and the voter was contacted in an attempt to "cure" the controversy, as outlined.per NVRA instructions.....

♦️THE NEXT CLAIM IN THIS "INSTANT" CASE IS/WAS:

from the Maryland Republican Party - {Quote}

""Huge Maryland election integrity victory in federal court!

The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland ruled that Maryland SBE violated federal law and unlawfully suppressed plaintiffs’ research on elections. This victory ensures the public access to critical tools for holding election administrators accountable to their obligation to maintain clean, up-to-date, and accurate voter rolls.""{End quote}

🚨 While "this victory" does address the illegality of the un-Constitutional requirement of signing an affidavit in order to obtain a copy of the voter rolls, that the applicant WILL NOT "use the rolls for research and investigations",

🔥 IT DOES NOT ensure "the public access to critical tools for holding election administrators accountable to their obligation to maintain clean, up-to-date, and accurate voter rolls", IN ANY WAY/SHAPE OR FORM.

🔥 "ACCOUNTABILITY" does NOT change‼️

🔥 NO NEW "OBLIGATIONS" are required....

🔥 There's NO SUCH THING as "up-to-date and accurate voter rolls"..... BECAUSE VOTER ROLLS ARE CONSTANTLY CHANGING including "same-day registration"‼️

#NewtonSaidIt a thousand times....

Whatever copy of the voter rolls you got was only as "accurate" as possible directed by compliance with NVRA for just that snapshot in time.....

👉🏾 I'd hardly describe this as "a HUGE VICTORY". This ruling merely permits public access by application to obtain a "current" available copy of the voter rolls without the restriction related to "research and investigation"; which BTW was procedure until very recently. (Yeah I published those details previously in real time).

https://www.md20-20watch.com/post/things-to-be-aware-of-since-july-2023

The fact is, permitted use of voter rolls is STILL legally restricted for specific purposes. YOU SHOULD READ THE LAW. (The link is provided above. See "voter registration/maintenance" - comprehension is required). 😎

Since it's now been established that while reading may be fundamental, comprehension seems not to be by many, but......

HERE YOU CAN READ HOW THE COURT SYSTEM VIEWED THE ISSUE OF VOTER ROLL MAINTENANCE in the PREVIOUS lawsuit presented by the same group of Plaintiffs.

https://www.democracydocket.com/cases/maryland-election-administration-challenge/

👉🏾 THEREIN you will "read":

✅ On May 8, 2024, the District Court dismissed the case.

✅ On May 15, the plaintiffs appealed this case to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Oral argument was held on Dec. 12, 2024.

✅ RESULT: On Feb. 4, 2025, the 4th Circuit AFFIRMED the District Court’s decision to DISMISS the case. "Maryland’s voter roll maintenance and election administration practices remain unchanged".

✳️ BECAUSE as I've shown above, the SBE IS IN COMPLIANCE with the NVRA‼️

🚨 SO IN SUMMARY - A copy of the "most currently available", ever-changing voter roll is STILL obtainable by application & fee....but NOW you can use it for whatever "research" you like, within the use guidelines as prescribed by law.....WITHOUT SIGNING "THAT AFFIDAVIT". (Eventhough Courts have held "voter rolls are UNRELIABLE" and can't be used as EVIDENCE).....but you still have to sign "AN AFFIDAVIT" that your use will only be for: "Non-commercial use". Any person who knowingly allows a list of registered voters, under the person's control, to be used for any purpose not related to the electoral process is guilty of a misdemeanor.

👉🏾 SOME ADDITIONAL HELPFUL INFORMATION can be found at:

https://elections.maryland.gov/forms/voter.html

✳️ Don't forget I have previously exposed who "Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections" (RITE) is.....and when I said "Deep State", I wasn't 🐂 💩💩